Claude SEO Agency for Getting Cited When Claude Searches

Anthropic hasn't published Claude's ranking rules. What's documented: Claude can search the web, it cites the sources it used, and it runs its own crawlers to fetch pages. What we observe: it tends to cite pages that answer the question directly, docs for technical prompts, and third-party comparisons for vendor questions. We test your prompts rather than rely on general patterns.

Anthropic doesn't document which index sits behind Claude's web search, so we don't build a plan on a guess. What it does document is Claude-SearchBot, its search crawler. None of our advice depends on the index: keep Claude's crawlers allowed, make pages readable without JavaScript and earn rankings on Google and Bing, since pages that rank there usually hold up in other indexes too.

Search answers can pick up a page once Claude's search can find it, so crawler access and docs structure are the faster fixes. Answers without search change only when Anthropic trains a newer model, which follows its release schedule, not ours. We read search-side progress at day 90 against the baseline and are clear about which part moved.

Start with the pages those visits land on, since they show what Claude already trusts you for. We work out the prompts that likely lead there, build neighbouring pages for related questions, and strengthen the third-party sources that back them up. Then we track whether the extra visits turn into signups and demos, not just sessions.

It's your call, and it's separate from search. Anthropic lists ClaudeBot as its training crawler, Claude-SearchBot for search and Claude-User for user requests. Blocking ClaudeBot keeps your content out of future training, while blocking Claude-SearchBot can reduce how often you appear in search answers. We set the rules to match the choice you make.

Anthropic hasn't said that Claude's search uses llms.txt to choose or cite sites, so we don't sell it as a lever. It can help a developer who pastes your docs into Claude, and it's cheap to publish. We add one when it's useful to your users and spend the real effort on pages and crawler access.

Often, but not automatically. Readable docs, clear brand pages, open crawler rules and accurate third-party mentions are what every engine reads, so the same work carries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and Copilot. Each engine picks its own sources, so we report results by engine and you can see where Claude stands against the rest each month.

Quoted after a free consultation. Scope depends on how much of your docs and brand pages need rebuilding and how many prompts matter to your buyers. We send a plan and a quote together, and work starts once you approve both. There are no package tiers, because two docs sites rarely need the same fixes.

Not yet, and we won't invent one. The engine set behind our published case studies didn't include Claude, so there is no Claude figure to show. Across the engines that were tracked, HeyOz went from no AI citations to 91 and Wisemonk's pages cited in AI answers went from 70 to 299. For new clients, Claude is in the prompt set and reported as its own line every month.